We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
[Initial management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 2014: From guidelines to practices, survey of 176 French interventional cardiologists].
Annales de Cardiologie et D'angéiologie 2017 September
BACKGROUND: Real life management of myocardial infarction has not recently been evaluated in France.
AIMS: To describe ST-elevation myocardial infarction management in France in 2014 and to compare it with current guidelines.
METHODS: A multicentre study was performed. An e-mail questionnaire was sent to French interventional cardiologists. Demographic data of interventional cardiologists, procedural aspects of percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic treatments and patient rehabilitation have been investigated.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six answers were analysed. Most of centres realized more than 600 annual angioplasties. An average of 209 myocardial infarctions were managed per centre in 2014, more often in academic than in general or private centres (respectively 51, 32 and 17% of infarctions). Anti-GPIIbIIIa (34% of the cases) and thromboaspiration were not systematic but depend on patient's characteristics, according to guidelines. Radial access was favoured in 85% of the cases and increased for the last decade. Drug eluting stents were used in 62% of cases. Unfractionated heparin and enoxaparine accounted for more than 80% of anticoagulants treatments. Overall, use of clopidogrel was as high as that of prasugrel or ticagrelor although clopidogrel is recommended in second-line. Cardiovascular rehabilitation was proposed to more than 50% of patients.
CONCLUSION: In spite of heterogeneity of ST-elevation myocardial infarction management in 2014, real-life practices generally comply with current guidelines.
AIMS: To describe ST-elevation myocardial infarction management in France in 2014 and to compare it with current guidelines.
METHODS: A multicentre study was performed. An e-mail questionnaire was sent to French interventional cardiologists. Demographic data of interventional cardiologists, procedural aspects of percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic treatments and patient rehabilitation have been investigated.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six answers were analysed. Most of centres realized more than 600 annual angioplasties. An average of 209 myocardial infarctions were managed per centre in 2014, more often in academic than in general or private centres (respectively 51, 32 and 17% of infarctions). Anti-GPIIbIIIa (34% of the cases) and thromboaspiration were not systematic but depend on patient's characteristics, according to guidelines. Radial access was favoured in 85% of the cases and increased for the last decade. Drug eluting stents were used in 62% of cases. Unfractionated heparin and enoxaparine accounted for more than 80% of anticoagulants treatments. Overall, use of clopidogrel was as high as that of prasugrel or ticagrelor although clopidogrel is recommended in second-line. Cardiovascular rehabilitation was proposed to more than 50% of patients.
CONCLUSION: In spite of heterogeneity of ST-elevation myocardial infarction management in 2014, real-life practices generally comply with current guidelines.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app