We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of Facility IAC-Accreditation on CT Dose Awareness and Reduction.
Radiologic Technology 2017 May
PURPOSE: To assess characteristics of computed tomography (CT) facilities accredited by the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) and evaluate the perceived effect of accreditation on CT radiation dose awareness and reduction.
METHODS: IAC-accredited CT facilities were sent a survey in April 2016, which included 20 questions categorized into 5 groups: equipment and facility (7), patient safety/practice (5), protocols (2), dose reduction practice (3), and quality improvement (3).
RESULTS: The response rate was 20.7% (N = 607). A majority of facilities (80%) reported that radiation dose was adjusted based on patient size. Before undergoing accreditation, 79% of facilities reported annual review of CT protocols and radiation exposure. Following accreditation, that number increased to 93%. A majority (77%) of respondents indicated that the accreditation process, along with the IAC Standards and Guidelines , increased awareness of radiation exposure; in addition, 36% indicated that radiation doses were lower after undertaking accreditation.
DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that most IAC-accredited facilities followed recommended radiation safety practices by adjusting radiation dose based on patient size, reviewing protocols annually, and participating in quality improvement activities that focus on patient radiation exposure.
CONCLUSION: IAC-accredited facilities reported that the accreditation process had a positive effect on radiation dose awareness and reduced dose associated with CT examinations.
METHODS: IAC-accredited CT facilities were sent a survey in April 2016, which included 20 questions categorized into 5 groups: equipment and facility (7), patient safety/practice (5), protocols (2), dose reduction practice (3), and quality improvement (3).
RESULTS: The response rate was 20.7% (N = 607). A majority of facilities (80%) reported that radiation dose was adjusted based on patient size. Before undergoing accreditation, 79% of facilities reported annual review of CT protocols and radiation exposure. Following accreditation, that number increased to 93%. A majority (77%) of respondents indicated that the accreditation process, along with the IAC Standards and Guidelines , increased awareness of radiation exposure; in addition, 36% indicated that radiation doses were lower after undertaking accreditation.
DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that most IAC-accredited facilities followed recommended radiation safety practices by adjusting radiation dose based on patient size, reviewing protocols annually, and participating in quality improvement activities that focus on patient radiation exposure.
CONCLUSION: IAC-accredited facilities reported that the accreditation process had a positive effect on radiation dose awareness and reduced dose associated with CT examinations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app