We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Head elevation and lateral head rotation effect on facemask ventilation efficiency: Randomized crossover trials.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2017 November
PURPOSE: We performed two prospective randomized crossover trials to evaluate the effect of head elevation or lateral head rotation to facemask ventilation volume.
METHODS: In the first trial, facemask ventilation was performed with a 12-cm high pillow (HP) and 4-cm low pillow (LP) in 20 female patients who were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia. In the second trial, facemask ventilation was performed with and without lateral head rotation in another 20 female patients. Ventilation volume was measured in a pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) manner at 10, 15, and 20 cmH2O inspiratory pressures.
RESULTS: In the first trial evaluating head elevation effect, facemask ventilation volume was significantly higher with a HP than with a LP at 15 and 20 cmH2O inspiratory pressure (15 cmH2O: HP median540 [IQR480-605] mL, LP 460 [400-520] mL, P=0.006, 20 cmH2O: HP 705 [650-800] mL, LP 560 [520-677] mL, P<0.001). In the second trial, lateral head rotation did not significantly increase facemask ventilation volume at all inspiratory pressure.
CONCLUSION: Head elevation increased facemask ventilation volume in normal airway patients, while lateral head rotation did not.
METHODS: In the first trial, facemask ventilation was performed with a 12-cm high pillow (HP) and 4-cm low pillow (LP) in 20 female patients who were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia. In the second trial, facemask ventilation was performed with and without lateral head rotation in another 20 female patients. Ventilation volume was measured in a pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) manner at 10, 15, and 20 cmH2O inspiratory pressures.
RESULTS: In the first trial evaluating head elevation effect, facemask ventilation volume was significantly higher with a HP than with a LP at 15 and 20 cmH2O inspiratory pressure (15 cmH2O: HP median540 [IQR480-605] mL, LP 460 [400-520] mL, P=0.006, 20 cmH2O: HP 705 [650-800] mL, LP 560 [520-677] mL, P<0.001). In the second trial, lateral head rotation did not significantly increase facemask ventilation volume at all inspiratory pressure.
CONCLUSION: Head elevation increased facemask ventilation volume in normal airway patients, while lateral head rotation did not.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app