Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The association between vacA or cagA status and eradication outcome of Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: H. pylori virulence factors, especially vacA and cagA are important in gastroduodenal disease pathogenesis and affect cure rates. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the association between vacA or cagA status and eradication outcome of H. pylori infection.

METHODS: A literature search was performed using electronic databases to identify studies. Twenty-six prospective studies were determined eligible. Meta-analytical techniques were conducted to calculate eradication rates and pooled relative ratios (RR).

RESULTS: The eradication rate was greater approximately 10% in vacA s1 compared with vacA s2 infected patients, and the pooled RR was 1.164 (95%CI: 1.040-1.303, P = 0.008). A significant association existed between vacA s1 and higher eradication rates in Europe (RR: 1.203, 95%CI: 1.003-1.442, P = 0.046) and Asia (RR: 1.187, 95%CI: 1.028-1.371, P = 0.020), in triple therapy patients (RR: 1.175, 95%CI: 1.012-1.365, P = 0.035). Eradication rates were similar for vacA m1 and m2 genotypes (RR: 0.981, 95%CI: 0.891-1.080, P = 0.690), whereas they were higher by approximately 8% in cagA-positive compared with cagA-negative infected patients, with a pooled RR of 1.094 (95%CI: 1.025-1.168, P = 0.007). A significant association existed between cagA-positive and increased eradication rates in Europe (RR: 1.138, 95%CI: 1.000-1.295, P = 0.049) and Asia (RR: 1.118, 95%CI: 1.051-1.190, P<0.001), in using PCR (RR: 1.232, 95%CI: 1.142-1.329, P<0.001) and protein chips (RR: 1.200, 95%CI: 1.060-1.359, P = 0.004), in triple therapy patients (RR: 1.090, 95%CI: 1.006-1.181, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS: Evidence indicates that infection with vacA s1, cagA-positive strains, but not vacA s2, cagA-negative, is more conducive to H. pylori eradication.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app