Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Impact of updating the MALDI-TOF MS database on the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Conventional identification of mycobacteria species is slow, laborious and has low discriminatory power. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has proved highly effective for identifying conventional bacteria, and it may also be useful for identifying mycobacteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare MALDI-TOF MS with currently recommended molecular methods for the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), applying Mycobacteria Libraries v3.0 (ML3.0) and v2.0 (ML2.0). A total of 240 clinical isolates of 41 NTM species grown on solid media were analysed: 132 isolates of slow-growing mycobacteria and 108 of rapid-growing mycobacteria. MALDI-TOF MS, using ML3.0, identified 192 (80%) NTM isolates with a score ≥1.7, encompassing 35 (85.4%) different species, that is, 17 (7.1%; p = 0.0863) isolates and 15 (36.6%; p = 0.0339) species more than currently recommended molecular techniques (polymerase chain reaction reverse hybridization). All these isolates were correctly identified according to molecular identification methods. The application of ML3.0 also identified 15 (6.2%) NTM isolates more than ML2.0 (p < 0.01). The scores obtained with MALDI-TOF MS using ML3.0 (mean score: 1.960) were higher in 147 (61.2%) isolates than when using ML2.0 (mean score: 1.797; p < 0.01). Three of the species analysed were not included in either database, so they were not recognized by this system. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF MS identified more isolates and species than the recommended polymerase chain reaction reverse hybridization assays. Although the new ML3.0 is not the definitive database, it yielded better results than ML2.0. This shows that the updating of the MALDI-TOF MS database plays an essential role in mycobacterial identification. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app