Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Efficacy of double mirrored omega pattern for skin sparing mastectomy to reduce ischemic complications.

BACKGROUND: Excellent cosmetic results from skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are often impaired by skin flaps' necrosis (SFN), from 8%-25% or worse in smokers. This study prospectively investigated the efficacy of Double-Mirrored Omega Pattern (DMOP-SSM) compared to Wise Pattern SSM (WP-SSM) for immediate reconstruction in moderate/large-breasted smokers.

METHODS: From 2008-2010, DMOP-SSM was performed in 51 consecutive immediate breast reconstructions on 41 smokers (mean age = 49.8 years) with moderate/large and ptotic breasts. This active group (AG) was compared to a similar historical control group (CG) of 37 smokers (mean age = 51.1 years) who underwent WP-SSM and immediate breast reconstruction, with a mean follow-up of 37.6 months. Skin ischaemic complications, number of surgical revisions, time to wound healing, and patient satisfaction were analysed. Descriptive statistics were reported and comparison of performance endpoints was performed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value <.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: Patients' mean age (p = .316) and BMI (p = .215) were not statistically different between groups. Ischaemic complications occurred in 11.7% of DMOP-SSMs and in 32.4% of WP-SSMs (p = .017), and revision rates were, respectively, 5.8% and 24.3% (p = .012), both statistically significant. Mean time to wound healing was, respectively, 16.8 days and 18.4 days (p = .205). Mean patients' satisfaction scores were, respectively, 18.9 and 21.1, statistically significant (p = .022).

CONCLUSION: Although tobacco use in moderate/large breasted patients can severely impair outcomes of breast reconstruction, the DMOP-SSM approach, compared to WP-SSM, allows smokers to benefit from SSM, but with statistically significant reduced skin flaps ischaemic complications, revision surgery, and better cosmetic outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app