Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Immunosuppressive drugs in whole blood: validation of a commercially available liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry kit and comparison with immunochemical assays.

RATIONALE: In the determination of immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine A (CSA), tacrolimus (TARO), sirolimus (SIRO), and everolimus (EVE) in whole blood there is an open debate about which is the best assay between immunochemistry and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). This work is aimed to explore this topic, focusing on the use of updated assays and the analysis of a large number of samples.

METHODS: A certified in vitro diagnostic kit coupled with a medical device LC/MS/MS was validated and applied to the analysis of 1192 blood samples of patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs. The results were compared with those obtained by immunoassays.

RESULTS: The LC/MS/MS approach was found to provide linear, stable, precise, and accurate results, with lower limits of quantification of 12.5, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.2 μg/L for CSA, TACRO, SIRO, and EVE, respectively. With this method 80 samples were analysed and reported within a single work shift. A correlation was observed between the LC/MS/MS and immunoassay data, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.980 (n = 260) for CSA, 0.836 for TACRO (n = 562), 0.898 for SIRO (n = 113), and 0.904 for EVE (n = 257). Passing-Bablock regression showed the presence of constant and proportional biases for most of the drugs. A Blond-Altman graph showed differences between the assays, with immunoassays generally overestimating the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS: The LC/MS/MS certified kit was validated for the detection of immunosuppressant drugs in whole blood and it provided a high-throughput method that is consistent with the requirements of clinical laboratories. The comparison of patient data between LC/MS/MS and up-dated immunoassays shows that a significant discrepancy still exists, especially for CSA and SIRO, confirming the greater specificity associated with use of the LC/MS/MS assay Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app