Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term follow-up after traditional versus modified perineal approach in the management of female epispadias.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated female epispadias (IFE) is a rare congenital anomaly. The defect extends to the bladder neck, which is usually incompetent. The traditional surgical approach includes urethral and genital reconstruction in the first year, followed by bladder neck reconstruction (Young-Dees-Leadbetter cervicoplasty (YDL)) at the age of social continence. An alternative single-stage technique includes urethral, bladder neck and clitoris repair by a perineal approach. The aim of the present study was to describe long-term follow-up of patients who underwent the traditional vs alternative approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all female epispadias cases managed between 2000 and 2013. The YDL procedure (Group 1) vs single-stage perineal approach (Group 2) cases were followed and compared. Collected variables included: patients' demographics, age at diagnosis and surgery, presence of associated anomalies, clinical presentation, presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and pre-operative and postoperative continence.

RESULTS: A total of 12 cases of female epispadias were managed and followed between 2000 and 2013. No major complications occurred in either group. Urinary continence evaluated in seven children showed that none (0/3) and 4/7 (57%) were continent following the initial procedure in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. All patients in Group 1 failed to achieve continence and required re-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: Female epispadias could be successfully repaired using a single-stage modified perineal approach that achieved good continence with volitional voiding, good cosmetic results and compared favorably with the ones repaired with the YDL technique. The additional step of performing bladder neck tailoring to achieve a funneling configuration seemed to be useful in improving continence.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app