Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Bone Mineral Density Measurements Around Osseointegrated Implants: A Precision Study and Validation of Scan Protocol for Transfemoral Amputees.

Visual evaluation of bone changes around an osseointegration (OI) implant in femoral amputees examined on plain radiographs shows that periprosthetic bone resorption takes place during the first years after OI surgery, but the bone mineral density (BMD) change has not been previously quantified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Precision is vital when monitoring BMD changes around implants, and thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and feasibility of a scan protocol for BMD measurements in proximity of OI implants. The proximal part of 2 human cadaveric femoral bones (specimens A and B) with OI implants were mounted in a positioning jig and DXA scans were repeated 5 times in increments of 5° from neutral (0°) to 20° flexion and rotation. BMD changes as a result of change in leg position were evaluated. Repeated patient examinations (n = 20) were conducted in a clinical setting and the precision error was calculated for each of 7 periprosthetic custom-made regions of interest (ROIs). The precision of cadaveric BMD measurements in neutral position was <3.3%. Even 5° flexion or rotation in femur position caused significant changes in average BMD (p <0.04). Depending on ROI, the percentage of coefficient of variation (%CV) and average BMD was <6% at 10° flexion and rotation. At 20° flexion, %CV increased up to 12.7% and average BMD increased up to 9.9%. The clinical short-term precision root mean square standard deviation ranged from 0.031 g/cm2 to 0.047 g/cm2 and %CV ranged from 3.12% to 6.57% depending on ROI. Simulated hip flexion or rotation of the femur affected periprosthetic BMD measurements around OI implants in cadaveric femoral bones, which stresses the importance of a reproducible set-up during DXA scans to reduce measurement errors caused by variation in leg position. Adherence to the scan protocol with a relaxed position of the residual limb resulted in an acceptable short-term precision below 6.6%.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app