Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

p16/Ki-67 dual labeling and urinary cytology results according to the New Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: Impact of extended follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of p16INK4a has been identified in urothelial malignancies both cytologically and histologically. In addition, p16/Ki-67 dual labeling has been shown to identify high-grade urothelial cancer cells and some progression cases within a 12-month delay. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was published in late 2015. Its aim is to clarify the criteria for diagnosing or, conversely, excluding high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC).

METHODS: Dual labeling was performed on archived ThinPrep-based Papanicolaou slides. A total of 208 samples (negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma [NHGUC], 59; consistent with low-grade urothelial neoplasia [LGUN], 24; atypical urothelial cells [AUC], 15; and suspicious for or showing HGUC, 110) were analyzed for p16/Ki-67 after reclassification according to TPS. We assessed the oncologic status of the patients with cystoscopy, urinary cytology, histology, and prolonged 36-month follow-up data.

RESULTS: The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 for life-threatening lesions was not different from that of urinary cytology (82.8% vs 83.6%; P = 1). However, among patients with samples classified as NHGUC and AUC, disease-free survival was significantly shorter for dual-labeled cases versus cases with negative dual labeling (P < .0001). The same tendency was observed in patients with histologically proven LGUN (P < .0001). As for specificity in patients with negative cystoscopy and cytology combined, prolonged follow-up showed 90% overall survival at 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS: A long-term evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual labeling may identify HGUC and progression in cases with negative/low-grade urinary cytology results, and there are potential implications for the clinical management of patients after the conservative treatment of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:552-62. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app