Comparing characteristics and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in low-flow vs normal-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in an Asian population.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In severe aortic stenosis (AS), deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to <50% is an AHA/ACC class I indication for valve replacement, regardless of symptoms. Controversy surrounds prognosis of low-flow AS compared to normal-flow, and no study has examined LVEF deterioration. We compared factors associated with LVEF deterioration (to <50%) and clinical outcomes.

METHODS: Consecutive subjects with low-flow (stroke volume index <35 mL/m2 , n=56) and normal-flow (n=72) severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm2 ) with preserved LVEF (>50%) and with paired echocardiography were studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with LVEF deterioration. Clinical outcomes were determined on follow-up for more than 5 years.

RESULTS: Significant LVEF deterioration (to <50%) was seen in 18% of low-flow (initial LVEF 63±8% to 32±9%) and 18% of normal-flow AS (61±7% to 31±12%). Independent factors in low-flow AS were hypertension (OR: 30.7, 95% CI: 2.0-467.6, P=.014) and higher end-systolic wall stress (OR: 1.086, 95% CI: 1.022-1.153, P=.008), compared to normal-flow, which were hypertension (OR: 15.9, 95% CI: 3.1-81.9, P=.001), higher septal E/E' ratio (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35, P=.043), lower septal S' velocity (OR: 0.204, 95% CI: 0.061-0.682, P=.010), and higher end-systolic wall stress (OR: 1.051, 95% CI: 1.001-1.104, P=.047). Overall, a third of the cohort experienced MACE, regardless of flow (log-rank 0.048, P=.827). However, aortic valve replacement (AVR) rates were lower in low-flow AS (20% vs 43%, P=.005).

CONCLUSIONS: Low-flow AS despite normal LVEF appears similar to normal-flow in terms of LVEF deterioration and clinical outcomes in our Asian population. AVR rate was lower even though low-flow may not reflect less severe disease.