We have located links that may give you full text access.
Potential of a cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases and concomitant extrahepatic disease.
Journal of Surgical Oncology 2017 March
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to define the cure rate in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and concomitant extrahepatic disease (EHD) on the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) after surgery, and identify the factors for predicting a cure.
METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM with concomitant EHD were identified. Those followed for >5 years after surgery were enrolled. A cure was defined as DFS of >5 years after the last curative surgery.
RESULTS: A cure was achieved in 24/175 (13%) patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] cohort), and 22/109 (19%) patients who underwent complete resection for both hepatic and extrahepatic metastases (EHD resection cohort). A multivariate analysis identified primary T1-2 (relative risk [RR] 47.4, P = 0.0001), metachronous metastasis (RR 4.9, P = 0.026), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) ≤37 U/mL (RR 8.37, P = 0.015), number of liver and EHD tumors (RR 11.2, P = 0.0058), and non-incidental EHD diagnosis (RR 8.41, P = 0.018) as independent factors that predicted a cure in the ITT cohort; and primary T1-2 (RR 22.2, P = 0.013), primary N0 (RR 4.42, P = 0.031), metachronous metastasis (RR 6.48, P = 0.013), and CA19-9 ≤37 U/mL (RR 27.4, P = 0.012) in the EHD resection cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Even when concomitant EHD is present, a potential of cure could be achieved with aggressive oncosurgical approach.
METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM with concomitant EHD were identified. Those followed for >5 years after surgery were enrolled. A cure was defined as DFS of >5 years after the last curative surgery.
RESULTS: A cure was achieved in 24/175 (13%) patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] cohort), and 22/109 (19%) patients who underwent complete resection for both hepatic and extrahepatic metastases (EHD resection cohort). A multivariate analysis identified primary T1-2 (relative risk [RR] 47.4, P = 0.0001), metachronous metastasis (RR 4.9, P = 0.026), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) ≤37 U/mL (RR 8.37, P = 0.015), number of liver and EHD tumors (RR 11.2, P = 0.0058), and non-incidental EHD diagnosis (RR 8.41, P = 0.018) as independent factors that predicted a cure in the ITT cohort; and primary T1-2 (RR 22.2, P = 0.013), primary N0 (RR 4.42, P = 0.031), metachronous metastasis (RR 6.48, P = 0.013), and CA19-9 ≤37 U/mL (RR 27.4, P = 0.012) in the EHD resection cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Even when concomitant EHD is present, a potential of cure could be achieved with aggressive oncosurgical approach.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app