Comparison of the Induction-to-Delivery Interval in Terminations of Pregnancy with or without Dilapan-S®.

OBJECTIVE: In France, terminations of pregnancy (TOP) for medical reasons beyond the second trimester use mifepristone and misoprostol. We sought to determine the effectiveness of Dilapan-S®, an osmotic cervical dilator, in shortening the induction-to-delivery interval (IDI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of TOP in 2010-2012 compared the results from 2 hospitals with different TOP protocols starting at 16 weeks' gestation, one (164 women) with and one (106) without Dilapan-S®. The principal endpoint was the IDI. Results were analyzed according to 2 definitions of induction onset: definition 1, first dose of misoprostol in both centers, or definition 2, dilator placement if used, and otherwise first dose of misoprostol.

RESULTS: With definition 1, the IDI was shorter with dilators (5 h 48 min vs. 10 h 18 min, p < 0.001); the rates of uterine evacuation within 12 and 24 h were higher (94.5 and 100 vs. 68.9 and 91.5%, p < 0.001), and the time between first misoprostol dose and amniotomy was shorter (0 h 47 min vs. 4 h 30 min, p < 0.001). Under definition 2, the IDI was longer with dilators (18 h 24 min vs. 10 h 18 min, p < 0.001), but the rate of evacuation within 24 h did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION: Dilapan-S® acts on cervical ripening and dilatation, thereby allowing early amniotomy. Assessing potential side effects and women's satisfaction requires prospective trials.