One Year Clinical Correlates of EtG Positive Urine Screening in Alcohol-Dependent Patients: A Survival Analysis.

Aims: Little evidence exists supporting the efficacy of regular alcohol urine screening (RAUS) in the management of alcohol dependence, despite recent improvements in urine biomarkers. In this study, we aimed at investigating 1 year, differential clinical correlates between a positive and a negative baseline urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG) screening.

Methods: Alcohol-dependent outpatients participating in a previous cross-sectional study where EtG and ethanol diagnostic performances were compared in a double blind design were included. After 1 year, the presence of relapse, the number of hospitalizations and whether patients had abandoned treatment or not were assessed from electronic medical records. A survival analysis was conducted to compare time to relapse between EtG negative and positive subjects. Regression models were performed to compare the mean number of days hospitalized between groups, the risk of being lost to follow-up and treatment expenses.

Results: Of note, 152 patients (mean age 52, 67% males) were included. The mean time to relapse was of 163 days in EtG positive subjects, compared to 329 days in those with a negative result. In the Cox-regression model, only EtG positivity yielded significant results, with a hazard ratio of 5:3 (95% CI: 3.1-9.1). EtG positive was also the only significant predictor of a greater number of hospitalization days and treatment expenses. Younger age was the only variable predicting a greater risk of treatment abandonment.

Conclusion: RAUS with sensible biomarkers could improve clinicians' ability to assess patients' relapse risk. Further prospective studies will have to determine if this can be translated into a better prevention capacity.

Short summary: Positive urine screenings, when conducted with highly sensible alcohol biomarkers, significantly indicate a greater risk of relapse in alcohol-dependent patients and have the capacity to predict a greater risk of hospitalization and greater treatment expenses.