We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Plaque erosion delays vascular healing after drug eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: An In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
OBJECTIVES: To compare vascular healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation between plaque rupture (PR) and plaque erosion (PE).
BACKGROUND: Vascular response after stent implantation in patients with PR has been extensively studied. Little is known about vascular healing after stent implantation in PE.
METHODS: Sixty-five ACS patients who received optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the culprit lesions both before and after stent implantation at baseline as well as at 6 months were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: PR (n = 19) and PE (n = 24). Prestent thrombus burden and poststent intrastent structure (ISS) volume were analyzed during the index procedure. The ratio of uncovered to total stent struts per cross-section score (RUTTS) and neointimal thickness and area were measured at follow-up.
RESULTS: OCT imaging showed that compared with PR, PE showed a significantly lower prestent thrombus score (34.2 ± 19.2 vs. 68.6 ± 44.2, P = 0.009) at baseline and a smaller poststent ISS volume (0.7 ± 0.9 mm3 vs. 2.1 ± 1.9 mm3 , P = 0.019). At the 6-month follow-up, PE showed a higher incidence of RUTTS >0.3 (12.2 ± 14.4 vs. 2.0 ± 4.5%, P = 0.003), thinner neointimal thickness (0.05 ± 0.02 mm vs. 0.12 ± 0.08 mm, P = 0.002), and smaller neointimal area (0.5 ± 0.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 mm2 , P = 0.004) compared with PR. In a multivariate logistic model, PE was identified as an independent predictor for RUTTS >0.3.
CONCLUSIONS: PE was associated with less favorable healing following DES implantation when compared to PR at 6 months, indicating longer dual-antiplatelet therapy may be necessary for patients with PE. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Vascular response after stent implantation in patients with PR has been extensively studied. Little is known about vascular healing after stent implantation in PE.
METHODS: Sixty-five ACS patients who received optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the culprit lesions both before and after stent implantation at baseline as well as at 6 months were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: PR (n = 19) and PE (n = 24). Prestent thrombus burden and poststent intrastent structure (ISS) volume were analyzed during the index procedure. The ratio of uncovered to total stent struts per cross-section score (RUTTS) and neointimal thickness and area were measured at follow-up.
RESULTS: OCT imaging showed that compared with PR, PE showed a significantly lower prestent thrombus score (34.2 ± 19.2 vs. 68.6 ± 44.2, P = 0.009) at baseline and a smaller poststent ISS volume (0.7 ± 0.9 mm3 vs. 2.1 ± 1.9 mm3 , P = 0.019). At the 6-month follow-up, PE showed a higher incidence of RUTTS >0.3 (12.2 ± 14.4 vs. 2.0 ± 4.5%, P = 0.003), thinner neointimal thickness (0.05 ± 0.02 mm vs. 0.12 ± 0.08 mm, P = 0.002), and smaller neointimal area (0.5 ± 0.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 mm2 , P = 0.004) compared with PR. In a multivariate logistic model, PE was identified as an independent predictor for RUTTS >0.3.
CONCLUSIONS: PE was associated with less favorable healing following DES implantation when compared to PR at 6 months, indicating longer dual-antiplatelet therapy may be necessary for patients with PE. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app