Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Effects and related mechanism of angiotensin-(1-7) on Toll-like receptor 4-mediated oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells].

Objective: To explore the role and related mechanisms of angiotensin-(1-7)(Ang-(1-7)) on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) mediated oxidized low-density lipoprotein(ox-LDL)-induced oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Methods: HUVECs were cultured in vitro and divided into six groups: the control group (normal medium), the ox-LDL group(treated with 75 mg/L ox-LDL), the ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (1 μmol/L Ang-(1-7) pretreated for 30 minutes, then intervened with 75 mg/L ox-LDL), the ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group(1 μmol/L A-779 (Mas receptor) pretreated for 30 minutes, 1 μmol/L Ang-(1-7) pretreated for 30 minutes, then intervened with 75 mg/L ox-LDL), the ox-LDL+ A-779 group (1 μmol/L A-779 pretreated for 30 minutes, then intervened with 75 mg/L ox-LDL), the ox-LDL+ HTA125 group (10 μg/L HTA125 (TLR4-blocking antibody) pretreated for 30 minutes, then intervened with 75 mg/L ox-LDL ). The corresponding index was detected after 24 hours after intervention. Apoptosis of cells were detected by Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining flow cytometry and transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL). The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), products in oxidative stress, were detected by DCFH-DA staining. The mRNA and protein expression levels of NADPH oxidase 4(NOX4) and TLR4 were detected by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting analysis respectively. Results: (1) The results of Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining flow cytometry showed that the proportion of apoptotic cells was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group ((21.18±1.40)% vs. (1.59±0.26)%, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group((7.42±1.07)%) and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group((9.19±1.01)%) than in ox-LDL group (both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group ((19.91±1.30)%) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group((20.47±0.95)%) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). (2) The TUNEL results showed that the proportion of apoptotic cells was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group((10.83±0.77)% vs. (2.83±0.82)%, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group ((3.66±0.54)%)and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group((4.97±0.60)%) than in ox-LDL group(both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group((10.69±0.62)%) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group((11.43±0.42)%) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). (3) ROS level was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group(0.093±0.014 vs. 0.053±0.011, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (0.063±0.011, P<0.01)and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group(0.070±0.010, P<0.05)than in ox-LDL group, higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group(0.088±0.003) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group(0.095±0.005) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). (4) The mRNA expression level of NOX4 was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group(11.74±0.65 vs. 1.00±0.00, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (2.85±0.75)and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group(5.57±0.52) than in ox-LDL group(both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group(10.51±0.54) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group (11.04±1.01) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL group than in control group(27.60±1.86 vs. 1.00±0.00, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (8.00±1.03)and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group(14.83±0.97)than in ox-LDL group(both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group(24.81±2.19) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group (26.64±0.65)than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). (5)The protein expression level of NOX4 was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group (0.61±0.09 vs. 0.23±0.02, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group(0.27±0.03) and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group(0.22±0.02) than in ox-LDL group(both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group (0.58±0.06)and ox-LDL+ A-779 group(0.61±0.03) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). The protein expression level of TLR4 was higher in ox-LDL group than in control group(0.18±0.02 vs. 0.08±0.01, P<0.01), lower in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group(0.07±0.01) and ox-LDL+ HTA125 group(0.09±0.01) than in ox-LDL group(both P<0.01), higher in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7)+ A-779 group(0.18±0.02) and ox-LDL+ A-779 group(0.20±0.02) than in ox-LDL+ Ang-(1-7) group (both P<0.01). Conclusion: TLR4 mediated the ox-LDL induced injury in HUVECs, and Ang-(1-7) could attenuate ox-LDL induced injury in HUVECs by modulating the specific Mas receptors.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app