We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pharmacokinetic considerations in antipsychotic augmentation strategies: How to combine risperidone with low-potency antipsychotics.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate in vivo the effect of low-potency antipsychotics on metabolism of risperidone (RIS).
METHODS: A therapeutic drug monitoring database containing plasma concentrations of RIS and its metabolite 9-OH-RIS of 1584 patients was analyzed. Five groups were compared; a risperidone group (n=842) and four co- medication groups; a group co-medicated with chlorprothixene (n=67), a group with levomepromazine (n=32), a group with melperone (n=46), a group with pipamperone (n=63) and a group with prothipendyl (n=24). Plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D) of RIS, 9-OH-RIS and active moiety (RIS+9-OH-RIS; AM) as well as the metabolic ratios (9-OH-RIS/RIS; MR) were computed.
RESULTS: Differences in plasma concentrations were detected for AM and RIS. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant findings; RIS plasma concentrations were higher in co-medication groups than in monotherapy group. Chlorprothixene- and prothipendyl- medicated patients demonstrated no other differences. In the levomepromazine and melperone group plasma and C/D concentrations of AM and RIS were higher, while MRs were lower. For pipamperone, differences included higher C/D values of RIS and lower MRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of risperidone metabolism suggest pharmacokinetic interactions for levomepromazine and melperone. In the pipamperone-group, lower MRs as well as higher plasma and C/D levels of RIS suggest potential interactions.
METHODS: A therapeutic drug monitoring database containing plasma concentrations of RIS and its metabolite 9-OH-RIS of 1584 patients was analyzed. Five groups were compared; a risperidone group (n=842) and four co- medication groups; a group co-medicated with chlorprothixene (n=67), a group with levomepromazine (n=32), a group with melperone (n=46), a group with pipamperone (n=63) and a group with prothipendyl (n=24). Plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D) of RIS, 9-OH-RIS and active moiety (RIS+9-OH-RIS; AM) as well as the metabolic ratios (9-OH-RIS/RIS; MR) were computed.
RESULTS: Differences in plasma concentrations were detected for AM and RIS. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant findings; RIS plasma concentrations were higher in co-medication groups than in monotherapy group. Chlorprothixene- and prothipendyl- medicated patients demonstrated no other differences. In the levomepromazine and melperone group plasma and C/D concentrations of AM and RIS were higher, while MRs were lower. For pipamperone, differences included higher C/D values of RIS and lower MRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of risperidone metabolism suggest pharmacokinetic interactions for levomepromazine and melperone. In the pipamperone-group, lower MRs as well as higher plasma and C/D levels of RIS suggest potential interactions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app