We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Effect of gradient field nonlinearity distortions in MRI-based attenuation maps for PET reconstruction.
Physica Medica : PM 2017 March
PURPOSE: Attenuation correction is a requirement for quantification of the activity distribution in PET. The need to base attenuation correction on MRI instead of CT has arisen with the introduction of integrated PET/MRI systems. The aim was to describe the effect of residual gradient field nonlinearity distortions on PET attenuation correction.
METHODS: MRI distortions caused by gradient field nonlinearity were simulated in CT images used for attenuation correction in PET reconstructions. The simulations yielded radial distortion of up to ±2.3mm at 15cm from the scanner isocentre for distortion corrected images. The mean radial distortion of uncorrected images were 6.3mm at the same distance. Reconstructions of PET data were performed using the distortion corrected images as well as the images where no correction had been applied.
RESULTS: The mean relative difference in reconstructed PET uptake intensity due to incomplete distortion correction was less than ±5%. The magnitude of this difference varied between patients and the size of the distortions remaining after distortion correction.
CONCLUSIONS: Radial distortions of 2mm at 15cm radius from the scanner isocentre lead to PET attenuation correction errors smaller than 5%. Keeping the gradient field nonlinearity distortions below this limit can be a reasonable goal for MRI systems used for attenuation correction in PET for quantification purposes. A higher geometrical accuracy may, however, be warranted for quantification of peripheral lesions. These distortions can, e.g., be controlled at acceptance testing and subsequent quality assurance intervals.
METHODS: MRI distortions caused by gradient field nonlinearity were simulated in CT images used for attenuation correction in PET reconstructions. The simulations yielded radial distortion of up to ±2.3mm at 15cm from the scanner isocentre for distortion corrected images. The mean radial distortion of uncorrected images were 6.3mm at the same distance. Reconstructions of PET data were performed using the distortion corrected images as well as the images where no correction had been applied.
RESULTS: The mean relative difference in reconstructed PET uptake intensity due to incomplete distortion correction was less than ±5%. The magnitude of this difference varied between patients and the size of the distortions remaining after distortion correction.
CONCLUSIONS: Radial distortions of 2mm at 15cm radius from the scanner isocentre lead to PET attenuation correction errors smaller than 5%. Keeping the gradient field nonlinearity distortions below this limit can be a reasonable goal for MRI systems used for attenuation correction in PET for quantification purposes. A higher geometrical accuracy may, however, be warranted for quantification of peripheral lesions. These distortions can, e.g., be controlled at acceptance testing and subsequent quality assurance intervals.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app