Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Shared decision-making: when the doctor becomes the patient].

It was when a patient with a type A aortic dissection refused surgical treatment that our eyes were opened to the importance of shared decision-making (SDM). As these patients are usually transferred to the operating theatre without any opportunity for discussion about the indication for surgery, our department of cardiothoracic surgery rapidly became keen on applying the principles of SDM to all our patient contacts - as did other departments in our hospital. However, when I became a patient myself and was invited by my physicians to take part in the decision-making process about my treatment, I was surprised to find that I felt very reluctant to do so and preferred to be not involved at all. The various reasons I raised to explain this unexpected behaviour made good sense. Consequently, in my daily practice if a patient evidently does not want to take part in SDM, I now compassionately offer to make decisions myself without requiring their involvement.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app