We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of pessary use on hydronephrosis in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a self-selected interventional trial.
International Urogynecology Journal 2017 October
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of women who demonstrate improvement in hydronephrosis after pessary placement for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: This was a planned subset analysis of a prospective study on the prevalence of hydronephrosis in women with advanced POP. Women with anterior or apical POP ≥1 cm past the hymenal remnant were enrolled and screened for hydronephrosis. All were offered expectant management, pessary placement or surgery. Participants self-selecting pessary placement were compared with those with expectant management during the study period. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed after >3 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants demonstrating cure/improvement were compared using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Of 180 participants enrolled, 55 had hydronephrosis for a prevalence of 30.6% (95% CI 24.3-37.6%). Of those with hydronephrosis, 39 (70.8%) chose pessary placement while 16 (30.2%) declined. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed in 89% of participants at a median of 77 days (interquartile range 49-99 days). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis between women who accepted and those who declined pessary placement (p = 0.43). However, of 22 women successfully using a pessary, 77.3% showed improvement or cure, compared with 29.6% of 27 women not using a pessary (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Successful pessary use improved hydronephrosis in over 75% of women with advanced POP. Approximately 39% of women with prolapse did not comply with pessary use and did not demonstrate hydronephrosis improvement.
METHODS: This was a planned subset analysis of a prospective study on the prevalence of hydronephrosis in women with advanced POP. Women with anterior or apical POP ≥1 cm past the hymenal remnant were enrolled and screened for hydronephrosis. All were offered expectant management, pessary placement or surgery. Participants self-selecting pessary placement were compared with those with expectant management during the study period. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed after >3 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants demonstrating cure/improvement were compared using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Of 180 participants enrolled, 55 had hydronephrosis for a prevalence of 30.6% (95% CI 24.3-37.6%). Of those with hydronephrosis, 39 (70.8%) chose pessary placement while 16 (30.2%) declined. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed in 89% of participants at a median of 77 days (interquartile range 49-99 days). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis between women who accepted and those who declined pessary placement (p = 0.43). However, of 22 women successfully using a pessary, 77.3% showed improvement or cure, compared with 29.6% of 27 women not using a pessary (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Successful pessary use improved hydronephrosis in over 75% of women with advanced POP. Approximately 39% of women with prolapse did not comply with pessary use and did not demonstrate hydronephrosis improvement.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app