JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety and feasibility outcomes of robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and compare the clinicopathological features of women requiring adjuvant treatment with the historical literature.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study and review of literature (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

PATIENTS: All patients who underwent robotic radical parametrectomy with upper vaginectomy (RRPV), and pelvic lymphadenectomy for occult cervical cancer discovered after an extrafascial hysterectomy at our institution between January 2007 and December 2015.

INTERVENTIONS: RRPV and pelvic lymphadenectomy for occult cervical cancer discovered after an extrafascial hysterectomy. We also performed a literature review of the literature on radical parametrectomy after occult cervical carcinoma.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix discovered after extrafascial hysterectomy underwent RRPV with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. There were 2 intraoperative complications, including 1 bowel injury and 1 bladder injury. One patient required a blood transfusion of 2 units. Three patients underwent adjuvant treatment with chemoradiation with radiation-sensitizing cisplatin. One of these patients had residual carcinoma on the upper vagina, 1 patient had positive parametria and pelvic nodes, and 1 patient had positive pelvic lymph nodes. No patients experienced recurrence, and 1 patient died from unknown causes at 59.4 months after surgery. We analyzed 15 studies reported in the literature and found 238 women who underwent radical parametrectomy; however, no specific preoperative pathological features predicted outcomes, the need for adjuvant treatment, or parametrial involvement.

CONCLUSION: RRPV is a feasible and safe treatment option. As reflected in the literature, RRPV can help avoid empiric adjuvant chemoradiation; however, no pathological features predict the need for adjuvant treatment after surgery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app