We have located links that may give you full text access.
[What nurses see? Occurrence and typology of wastes in medical and surgical wards: a cross-sectional study.]
Professioni Infermieristiche 2016 October
AIM: To describe the occurrence and the typology of waste in the nurses clinical practice as well as the differences between the medical and surgical area.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a north eastern Italian hospital. Data collection, conducted on 100 nurses in September 2015, was carried out using a semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 56 items and eight dimensions (Overproduction / Underutilisation, Wait, Stocks, Process, Inefficiency and Errors, Material Transport and Information Flows, Movements, Dispersion of Knowledge).
RESULTS: In a nurses' working week 2,028 ± 9.2 waste occurrences were reported, with an average of 20.2 ±9.2 per nurse. Seven hundred fifty-nine (37.4%) of them occurred in the medical area, while 1,269 (63.6%) occurred in the surgical area. The most frequent number of waste (398; 19.6%) occurred in the "Process" dimension. Across the investigated dimensions, the main types of waste were: the inappropriate use of energy (30.0%), waiting for the physician (17.1%), shortage of materials (33.1%), the excess of human resources distributed in a sub-optimal manner (31.8%), human resources shortage (22.4%), incomprehensible and/or incomplete therapeutic prescriptions (22.6%), the search of materials in distant warehouses or in outside locale (23.9%), the transfer of team members from one department to another (30.0%), and limited application of scientific evidence in clinical practice (51.7%). No statistical differences emerged between the two investigated clinical areas (p-value = 0.480).
CONCLUSIONS: The study is a contribution to the national debate on the phenomenon of waste in health care organizations, and provides useful insights on the possible strategies of its containment.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a north eastern Italian hospital. Data collection, conducted on 100 nurses in September 2015, was carried out using a semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 56 items and eight dimensions (Overproduction / Underutilisation, Wait, Stocks, Process, Inefficiency and Errors, Material Transport and Information Flows, Movements, Dispersion of Knowledge).
RESULTS: In a nurses' working week 2,028 ± 9.2 waste occurrences were reported, with an average of 20.2 ±9.2 per nurse. Seven hundred fifty-nine (37.4%) of them occurred in the medical area, while 1,269 (63.6%) occurred in the surgical area. The most frequent number of waste (398; 19.6%) occurred in the "Process" dimension. Across the investigated dimensions, the main types of waste were: the inappropriate use of energy (30.0%), waiting for the physician (17.1%), shortage of materials (33.1%), the excess of human resources distributed in a sub-optimal manner (31.8%), human resources shortage (22.4%), incomprehensible and/or incomplete therapeutic prescriptions (22.6%), the search of materials in distant warehouses or in outside locale (23.9%), the transfer of team members from one department to another (30.0%), and limited application of scientific evidence in clinical practice (51.7%). No statistical differences emerged between the two investigated clinical areas (p-value = 0.480).
CONCLUSIONS: The study is a contribution to the national debate on the phenomenon of waste in health care organizations, and provides useful insights on the possible strategies of its containment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app