Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy].

Urologii︠a︡ 2016 April
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of retrospective results of treatment of patients with kidney cancer, who have undergone a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 patients with kidney tumour, who have undergone a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy during 2010-2015. Amongst the participants there were 116 men (62.7%) and 69 women (37.3%) aged 29-86 (average age of 58.1 years). 150 patients (81.1%) have performed radical nephrectomy by transperitoneal access, while 30 patients (16.2%) experienced identical process through retroperitoneal access. 5 cases (2.7%) hybrid technique was utilized. 97 patients performed nephrectomy on the right side, 88 patients on the left side. 178 patients (96.2%) had a single kidney tumours, while 7 (3.8%) had multiple tumours ranging between 2-8. 15 patients, who experienced a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, had a thrombus in kidney vein (level 1 under Mayo classification). 1 patient had a thrombus in vena cava (level 2).

RESULTS: Only one of the patients suffered a fatal outcome. 12 patients (6.5%) had a conversion. The duration of operation ranged between 50-215 minutes (average of 104.3 minutes), time of insufflation ranged between 36-205 minutes (average of 96.2 minutes). Average intraoperative blood loss constituted 147.8 ml. Patients spent 2-18 days (average 4.1 days) in the hospital after the surgery.

CONCLUSION: There is an obvious advantage to utilizing a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic intervention in order to treat kidney cancer. The process constitutes minimal invasiveness, low death rates, minimal intraoperative blood loss and fast rehabilitation of the patients. 72% of patients who have who have experienced surgical intervention, such as radical nephrectomy, spent only 3-4 days in the hospital.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app