We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio with ER and PR in breast cancer patients and their changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Clinical & Translational Oncology 2017 August
PURPOSE: Proinflammatory markers, including neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are associated with many aspects of different malignancies. The aim of this study was to assess the associations of NLR and PLR with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in locally advanced breast cancer patients and their changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Whether these parameters were predictive for the response to NAC in breast cancer patients was also evaluated.
METHODS: 132 Female primary locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with either ET (epirubicin-docetaxel), TEC (docetaxel-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide), or CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) as NAC were retrospectively studied. NLR and PLR were calculated from peripheral blood cell count and their optimal cutoff levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: The proportion of ER-positive breast cancers before NAC was higher both in NLRlow (<2.05) group and PLRlow group (<159.01). Changes in ER or PR expression level or status were observed in some patients. The alterations of NLR and PLR after NAC correlated with chemotherapy regimens, and elevated PLR was found. The patients with low pretreatment NLR (<1.67) or PLR (<151.27) had better responses to NAC than those with high NLR (≥1.67, 67.3 vs. 47.1%, P < 0.05) or PLR (≥151.27, 64.0 vs. 45.1%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients with low pretreatment NLR (<2.05) or PLR (<159.01) had higher ER expression. Changes in ER and PR expression status or level occured following NAC. Elevated PLR was found aft-NAC. Pretreatment NLR and PLR may be important predictive indicators for NAC response in breast cancer patients.
METHODS: 132 Female primary locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with either ET (epirubicin-docetaxel), TEC (docetaxel-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide), or CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) as NAC were retrospectively studied. NLR and PLR were calculated from peripheral blood cell count and their optimal cutoff levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: The proportion of ER-positive breast cancers before NAC was higher both in NLRlow (<2.05) group and PLRlow group (<159.01). Changes in ER or PR expression level or status were observed in some patients. The alterations of NLR and PLR after NAC correlated with chemotherapy regimens, and elevated PLR was found. The patients with low pretreatment NLR (<1.67) or PLR (<151.27) had better responses to NAC than those with high NLR (≥1.67, 67.3 vs. 47.1%, P < 0.05) or PLR (≥151.27, 64.0 vs. 45.1%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients with low pretreatment NLR (<2.05) or PLR (<159.01) had higher ER expression. Changes in ER and PR expression status or level occured following NAC. Elevated PLR was found aft-NAC. Pretreatment NLR and PLR may be important predictive indicators for NAC response in breast cancer patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app