JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI assessment of chemoradiation-induced pelvic bone marrow changes in cervical cancer and correlation with hematological toxicity.

PURPOSE: To investigate bone marrow changes after chemoradiation (CRT) using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI) and correlate imaging changes with hematological toxicity (HT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer were prospectively recruited for two sequential 3.0T IVIM-MRI studies: before treatment (MRI-1) and 3-4 weeks after standardized CRT (MRI-2). The irradiated pelvic bone marrow was outlined as the regions of interest to derive the true diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f) based on a biexponential model. The apparent coefficient diffusion (ADC) was derived using the monoexponential model. Changes in these parameters between MRI-1 and MRI-2 were calculated as ΔD, Δf, and ΔADC. HT was defined accordingly to NCI-CTCAE (v. 4.03) of grade 3 and above. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS: The median age of patients was 54 years old (range 27-83 years old); 14 patients suffered from HT. Early bone marrow changes (3-4 weeks) of ΔD showed a significant difference between HT and non-HT groups (6.4 ± 19.7% vs. -6.4 ± 19.4%, respectively, P = 0.041). However, no significant changes were noted in Δf (3.7 ± 13.3% vs. 1.5 ± 12.5% respectively, P = 0. 592) and ΔADC (5.5 ± 26.3% vs. -3.3 ± 27.0% respectively, P = 0.303) between the HT and non-HT groups. Δf increased insignificantly for both groups.

CONCLUSION: ΔD was the only significant parameter to differentiate early cellular environment changes in bone marrow after CRT, suggestive that ΔD was more sensitive than Δf and ΔADC to reflect the underlying microenvironment injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1491-1498.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app