Outcome of peripheral venous reconstructions during tumor resection.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral venous reconstruction surgery may be necessary for appropriate oncologic resection; however, the operative approach and surgical outcomes are not well described. We report our experience with these complex reconstructions to identify best practice.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who underwent peripheral vein reconstruction for tumor resection at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (2000-2015). Patients were classified into three subgroups by the location: iliac (IL), lower extremity (LE), and upper extremity (UE). Location, type of reconstruction, operative morbidity, as well as long-term patency, limb salvage, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were recorded.

RESULTS: We identified 27 patients (11 women and 16 men), with a mean age of 55 ± 15 years, who underwent 28 operations involving vein reconstruction during tumor resection. One patient underwent two vascular reconstructions for recurrent malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Concomitant artery reconstruction was required in 16 (57%). The most commonly treated tumors were rectal cancer (n = 4) and liposarcoma (n = 3). Reconstructions were IL in 19 (68%), LE in 6 (21%), and UE in 3 (11%). Venous reconstructions consisted of 7 vein grafts (25%), 17 polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic grafts (61%), 1 cryograft (4%), and 3 isolated patch angioplasties (11%). Two additional patch angioplasty procedures were performed in conjunction with vein grafts (1 polytetrafluoroethylene, 1 vein graft). There were no 30-day deaths. The mean hospital length of stay was 13.5 ± 10.5 days. Medications prescribed at discharge were aspirin in 15 patients (54%) and warfarin in 16 (57%). Surgical complications included renal failure (n = 5), respiratory complication (n = 3), surgical site infection (n = 5), graft infection (n = 3), and lymph leak (n = 5). The median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 17 days-14.1 years). At 2 and 5 years, overall primary patency was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-87%) and 61% (95% CI, 36%-87%), respectively, and overall freedom from graft thrombosis was 87% (95% CI, 69%-100%) and 87% (95% CI, 64%-100%), respectively. Graft thrombosis occurred in five patients (18%; 4 IL, 1 LE), of which four were prosthetic and one was a patch site. These were managed by thrombolysis (n = 1), thrombectomy (n = 1), and medical management (n = 3). Two patients (7.1%) underwent ipsilateral amputation at 3 and 314 days for compartment syndrome and metastatic pain. The overall survival rate was 74% (95% CI, 50%-87%) at 2 years and 56% (95% CI, 32%-75%) at 5 years. Death was predominantly from cancer-associated morbidities. Overall recurrence-free survival was 75% (95% CI, 57%-97%) at 2 years and 56% (95% CI, 31%-92%) at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients fit for advanced tumor resection, reconstruction of IL and extremity veins is a safe and durable, with excellent limb salvage. Vein and prosthetic reconstructions both appear effective; however, infectious complications and graft thrombosis remain important complications when selecting a prosthetic conduit.