COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Conventional Versus Inverted Side-cut Flaps for Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: Laboratory and Clinical Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To study the differences in early corneal cellular events and biomechanical properties after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK performed using conventional or inverted side-cut angles.

METHODS: In the laboratory study, left eyes of 24 rabbits underwent LASIK flap creation with a 70° or 115° side-cut. The contralateral eyes served as controls. The corneas were harvested 24 hours postoperatively. In the clinical study, 2 eyes of each patient (n = 29) were randomized to corneal flap creation with 70° or 115° side-cut angles during LASIK. The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) was used to assess biomechanical properties of the cornea.

RESULTS: In rabbit eyes, epithelial ingrowth was observed more frequently in flaps with 70° side cuts compared to flaps with 115° side-cuts. Corneas with 70° side-cuts showed significantly increased apoptotic cells compared to 115° side-cuts in the central (P = .001) and peripheral (P = .004) regions. Fifty-eight eyes of 29 patients were included in the clinical study. An overall reduction in Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, corneal resistance factor, corneal hysteresis measurements, p1 area, p2 area, and p1 area 1 and p2 area 1 was noted 37 ± 2 months after surgery (P < .001). No significant difference was observed in the change of any of these parameters between both groups (P ≥ .146).

CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in wound healing were observed in rabbit corneas that underwent LASIK with conventional or inverted side-cuts. Variation in flap side-cut angles did not alter the long-term biomechanical properties measured with the ORA in patients after LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(2):96-103.].

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app