Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Non-specific benign pathological results on transthoracic core-needle biopsy: how to differentiate false-negatives?

European Radiology 2017 September
OBJECTIVES: To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of non-specific benign results from cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy (TTNB) and identify predicting factors for false-negative for malignancies.

METHODS: From January 2009-December 2011, 1,108 consecutive patients with 1,116 lung lesions underwent CBCT-guided TTNB using an 18-gauge coaxial cutting needle. Among them, 226 patients with 226 TTNBs, initially diagnosed as non-specific benign, were included in this study. The medical charts, radiological or pathological follow-ups were reviewed to classify false-negative and true-negative results and to identify which variables were associated with false-negatives.

RESULTS: Of 226 lesions, 24 (10.6%) were finally confirmed as malignancies and 202 (89.4%) as benign, of which the NPV was 89.4% (202/226). Multivariate analysis revealed that part-solid nodule (PSN) (odds ratio (OR), 3.95; P = 0.022), a biopsy result of 'granulomatous inflammation' (OR, 0.04; P = 0.022), and exact location of needle tip within targets (OR, 0.37; P = 0.045) were significantly associated with false-negatives among initial non-specific benign biopsy results.

CONCLUSION: The NPV of the non-specific benign biopsy was 89.4%. PSN was a significant positive indicator, but a biopsy result of 'granulomatous inflammation' and exact location of needle tip within targets were significant negative indicators for false-negatives.

KEY POINTS: • The negative predictive value of the non-specific benign biopsy was 89.4%. • A part-solid nodule is a significant predictor for false-negative biopsy (OR = 3.95). • Pathological diagnosis of granulomatous inflammation is a robust indicator for 'true-negatives'. • Identifying needle tip within target lesions is a significant predictor for 'true-negatives'.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app