We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparison of energy expenditure and heart rate responses between three commercial group fitness classes.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2017 July
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare the energy expenditure and heart rate responses between three commercial group fitness classes (group resistance exercise [PUMP]; indoor stationary cycling [RIDE]; and step aerobics [STEP]).
DESIGN: One-Way Repeated Measures incorporating a Latin Square Design for class randomisation.
METHODS: Ten participants (5 males and 5 females) completed each group fitness class in random order with energy expenditure and heart rate determined using an Actiheart monitor.
RESULTS: STEP and RIDE produced significantly (p<0.05) higher average heart rates (HRavg ) (85.8±5.1% and 86.4±4.3% of HRmax , respectively) compared to PUMP (73.7±7% of HRmax ). HRpeak was also significantly (p<0.05) higher in STEP and RIDE (97.1±4.7% and 95.6±4.5% of HRmax, respectively) when compared with the PUMP class (90±5.9% of HRmax ). Total energy expenditure (TEE), both absolute and relative, were significantly (p<0.05) higher for STEP (2101.7±560.2kJ and 0.59±0.07kJkg-1 min-1 ) and RIDE (1880.4±420kJ and 0.58±0.03kJkg-1 min-1 ) when compared with the PUMP class (1385.1±504kJ and 0.36±0.07kJkg-1 min-1 ).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that overall exercise intensity and energy expenditure was highly comparable between RIDE and STEP, which suggests these group fitness classes are more effective for developing cardiovascular fitness and assisting with weight management compared with group resistance exercise classes when performed on a regular basis.
DESIGN: One-Way Repeated Measures incorporating a Latin Square Design for class randomisation.
METHODS: Ten participants (5 males and 5 females) completed each group fitness class in random order with energy expenditure and heart rate determined using an Actiheart monitor.
RESULTS: STEP and RIDE produced significantly (p<0.05) higher average heart rates (HRavg ) (85.8±5.1% and 86.4±4.3% of HRmax , respectively) compared to PUMP (73.7±7% of HRmax ). HRpeak was also significantly (p<0.05) higher in STEP and RIDE (97.1±4.7% and 95.6±4.5% of HRmax, respectively) when compared with the PUMP class (90±5.9% of HRmax ). Total energy expenditure (TEE), both absolute and relative, were significantly (p<0.05) higher for STEP (2101.7±560.2kJ and 0.59±0.07kJkg-1 min-1 ) and RIDE (1880.4±420kJ and 0.58±0.03kJkg-1 min-1 ) when compared with the PUMP class (1385.1±504kJ and 0.36±0.07kJkg-1 min-1 ).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that overall exercise intensity and energy expenditure was highly comparable between RIDE and STEP, which suggests these group fitness classes are more effective for developing cardiovascular fitness and assisting with weight management compared with group resistance exercise classes when performed on a regular basis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app