Journal Article
Observational Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Relationship between normal preoperative white blood cell count and major adverse events after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a pilot study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count within the reference range and major adverse events (MAEs) following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

DESIGN: Prospective observational study.

SETTING: Vascular surgery clinic in a tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-three consecutive patients.

INTERVENTION: Endovascular repair of AAA.

MEASUREMENTS: All patients had normal preoperative WBC count (3.5-10.3 K/μL). Postoperative MAE was defined as death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. The prognostic value of preoperative WBC was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves, whereas χ(2) test and Cochran-Armitage trend test were used to assess the association between MAE and different values of WBC.

MAIN RESULTS: A preoperative WBC cutoff value of 7.3 Κ/μL could predict MAE with 62% sensitivity and 62% specificity (area under the curve, 0.62). Patients with higher preoperative WBC experienced more events compared with patients with lower values (P=.027). A linear relationship was observed between an increasing preoperative WBC count within the reference range and the risk of postoperative events (P=.004). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative normal WBC count was an independent predictor of MAE and revealed that for every 1-K/μL increase, patients had a 32.8% increase in their relative odds of developing postoperative MAE (P=.035).

CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates a linear correlation between an increasing preoperative WBC count within the reference range and an increased risk for postoperative MAEs following endovascular repair for AAA. Identification of high-risk patients at an early stage by using WBC count could prove useful in implementing measures to improve their clinical outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app