We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and feasibility of motor-cognitive dual task assessments in patients with dementia.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of dual task (DT) assessments in patients with dementia.
DESIGN: Validation study.
SETTING: Post ward-rehabilitation.
PARTICIPANTS: Geriatric patients (n=105) with dementia (age 82.7±5.9, MMSE score 21.9).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric quality of DT performance of different DT-tests. Analyses were performed for motor and cognitive performance, and relative DT costs (DTCs).
RESULTS: Spearman's rank correlations (rs) between examined DT-tests were moderate-high for motor tasks (rs=0.29-0.90), small-high for cognitive tasks (rs=0.12-0.55) and small-high for relative DTCs (motor DTCs rs=0.02-0.61, cognitive DTCs rs=-0.19 to 0.06, combined DTCs rs=-0.11 to 0.31). Correlations with external assessment were moderate-high for motor tasks (rs=0.25-0.84), small-moderate for cognitive tasks (rs=-0.10 to 0.46) and small-moderate for relative DTCs (motor DTCs rs=-0.09 to 0.17, cognitive DTCs rs=-0.03 to 0.21, combined DTCs rs=-0.07 to 0.26). Test-retest reliability was excellent for motor tasks (ICC=0.75-0.96), fair-excellent for cognitive tasks (ICC=0.51-0.88) and poor-good for relative DTCs (motor DTCs ICC=0.10-0.74, cognitive DTCs ICC=0.05-0.65, combined DTCs ICC=0.15-0.71). Sensitivity to change was acceptable-excellent for trained DT-tests (p≤0.01). Effect sizes were small-large for gait parameters (SRM=0.30-1.12), large for cognitive tasks (SRM=0.82-0.95) and small-large for relative DTCs (motor DTCs SRM=0.15-0.77, cognitive DTCs SRM=0.56-0.98, combined DTCs SRM=0.40-1.10). Completion time ranged from 13.1 to 16.9min.
CONCLUSIONS: All DT-tests showed acceptable-excellent psychometric properties in patients with dementia with highest quality for the gait-based tests 'Walking & Counting' and 'Walking & reciting ABC'.
DESIGN: Validation study.
SETTING: Post ward-rehabilitation.
PARTICIPANTS: Geriatric patients (n=105) with dementia (age 82.7±5.9, MMSE score 21.9).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric quality of DT performance of different DT-tests. Analyses were performed for motor and cognitive performance, and relative DT costs (DTCs).
RESULTS: Spearman's rank correlations (rs) between examined DT-tests were moderate-high for motor tasks (rs=0.29-0.90), small-high for cognitive tasks (rs=0.12-0.55) and small-high for relative DTCs (motor DTCs rs=0.02-0.61, cognitive DTCs rs=-0.19 to 0.06, combined DTCs rs=-0.11 to 0.31). Correlations with external assessment were moderate-high for motor tasks (rs=0.25-0.84), small-moderate for cognitive tasks (rs=-0.10 to 0.46) and small-moderate for relative DTCs (motor DTCs rs=-0.09 to 0.17, cognitive DTCs rs=-0.03 to 0.21, combined DTCs rs=-0.07 to 0.26). Test-retest reliability was excellent for motor tasks (ICC=0.75-0.96), fair-excellent for cognitive tasks (ICC=0.51-0.88) and poor-good for relative DTCs (motor DTCs ICC=0.10-0.74, cognitive DTCs ICC=0.05-0.65, combined DTCs ICC=0.15-0.71). Sensitivity to change was acceptable-excellent for trained DT-tests (p≤0.01). Effect sizes were small-large for gait parameters (SRM=0.30-1.12), large for cognitive tasks (SRM=0.82-0.95) and small-large for relative DTCs (motor DTCs SRM=0.15-0.77, cognitive DTCs SRM=0.56-0.98, combined DTCs SRM=0.40-1.10). Completion time ranged from 13.1 to 16.9min.
CONCLUSIONS: All DT-tests showed acceptable-excellent psychometric properties in patients with dementia with highest quality for the gait-based tests 'Walking & Counting' and 'Walking & reciting ABC'.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app