We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
The influence of parents' voice on the consumption of propofol for pediatric procedural sedation-a randomized controlled trial.
Paediatric Anaesthesia 2017 April
BACKGROUND: In pediatric patients, invasive procedures such as the insertion of a central venous catheter or gastroscopy require deep sedation. It is unknown whether listening to parental voice during deep sedation in children can reduce sedative doses.
AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effect of listening to a parent's voice during deep sedation on consumption of sedatives in children.
METHODS: Fifty children aged 2-14 years undergoing central line placement or gastroscopy under deep sedation with propofol were randomly assigned to two groups: (A) listening or (B) not listening their parents' recorded voice reading a standardized text by the use of earphones. Depth of sedation was monitored by Comfort Score and by Bispectral Index.
RESULTS: Mean sedative dose of propofol in both groups was equal (A 0.25 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) ; B 0.28 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) ; Δ -0.03 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) (CI 95% -0.08 to 0.01); P = 0.089). Furthermore, complication rate (P = 1.0) and recovery time (A 14.5 min; B 16.1 min; Δ = -1.6 min (CI 95% -6.98 to 3.81); P = 0.60) did not differ between the intervention and the control group.
CONCLUSION: Listening to parental voice during deep sedation does not result in a reduction of sedative dose in children undergoing short medical procedures.
AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effect of listening to a parent's voice during deep sedation on consumption of sedatives in children.
METHODS: Fifty children aged 2-14 years undergoing central line placement or gastroscopy under deep sedation with propofol were randomly assigned to two groups: (A) listening or (B) not listening their parents' recorded voice reading a standardized text by the use of earphones. Depth of sedation was monitored by Comfort Score and by Bispectral Index.
RESULTS: Mean sedative dose of propofol in both groups was equal (A 0.25 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) ; B 0.28 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) ; Δ -0.03 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) (CI 95% -0.08 to 0.01); P = 0.089). Furthermore, complication rate (P = 1.0) and recovery time (A 14.5 min; B 16.1 min; Δ = -1.6 min (CI 95% -6.98 to 3.81); P = 0.60) did not differ between the intervention and the control group.
CONCLUSION: Listening to parental voice during deep sedation does not result in a reduction of sedative dose in children undergoing short medical procedures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app