COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of manual and automatic processing of biological samples for electron microscopy.

The ultrastructure of a sample can be observed by electron microscopy (EM), which has become an indispensable research tool in morphological studies. However, EM sample preparation techniques are complicated and time-consuming, with a high labor cost. The current study was conducted to compare the conventional manual and automated methods for sample processing and post-staining for electron microscopy. Automated sample processing reduces OsO4 contamination, improves the efficiency of sample preparation and is easy to use. Therefore, the results of their study provide a practical and feasible method for the preparation of biological samples for electron microscopy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app