We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
Meta-analysis: Diagnostic Value of N-Terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide for Kawasaki Disease.
Clinical Laboratory 2016 October 2
BACKGROUND: Some studies have estimated the diagnostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) for Kawasaki Disease (KD), but the results are not always consistent. The aim of this study was to ascertain the diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for KD.
METHODS: EMBSAE and PubMed were searched up to June 30, 2015, to identify eligible studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for KD. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated using the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. The overall diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for KD was pooled in a bivariate model.
RESULTS: Finally, 7 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.84), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84 - 0.90). The overall sensitivity and specificity across five studies adopted the threshold of approximately 200 ng/L were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.90) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.82), respectively. The major design weaknesses of the eligible studies were twogate design and threshold not pre-specified.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that available studies suggest that NT-proBNP is a useful biomarker for KD. In addition, further well-designed studies are needed to rigorously evaluate the value of NT-proBNP in KD diagnosis.
METHODS: EMBSAE and PubMed were searched up to June 30, 2015, to identify eligible studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for KD. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated using the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. The overall diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for KD was pooled in a bivariate model.
RESULTS: Finally, 7 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.84), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84 - 0.90). The overall sensitivity and specificity across five studies adopted the threshold of approximately 200 ng/L were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.90) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.82), respectively. The major design weaknesses of the eligible studies were twogate design and threshold not pre-specified.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that available studies suggest that NT-proBNP is a useful biomarker for KD. In addition, further well-designed studies are needed to rigorously evaluate the value of NT-proBNP in KD diagnosis.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app