We have located links that may give you full text access.
Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Clinical Oral Investigations 2017 November
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of frameworks milled from semi-sintered regular zirconia and high-translucent (HT) zirconia blanks, fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three-unit, posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) frameworks were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 11) with two different laboratory computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems (Cercon/Ceramill). The replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fit under an optical microscope. Evaluation of the data was performed according to prior studies at a level of significance of 5%.
RESULTS: The systems showed a statistically significant influence on the internal fit of the frameworks (p ≤ 0.001) and on the marginal fit (p < 0.001). The type of material showed no influence on the marginal fit for the Cercon system (p = 0.636) and on the marginal fit (p = 0.064) and the internal fit (p = 0.316) for the Ceramill system, while regular zirconia from Cercon showed higher internal values than HT zirconia (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both investigated systems showed clinically acceptable values within the limitations of this in vitro study. However, one showed less internal accuracy when regular zirconia was used.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three-unit, posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) frameworks were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 11) with two different laboratory computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems (Cercon/Ceramill). The replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fit under an optical microscope. Evaluation of the data was performed according to prior studies at a level of significance of 5%.
RESULTS: The systems showed a statistically significant influence on the internal fit of the frameworks (p ≤ 0.001) and on the marginal fit (p < 0.001). The type of material showed no influence on the marginal fit for the Cercon system (p = 0.636) and on the marginal fit (p = 0.064) and the internal fit (p = 0.316) for the Ceramill system, while regular zirconia from Cercon showed higher internal values than HT zirconia (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both investigated systems showed clinically acceptable values within the limitations of this in vitro study. However, one showed less internal accuracy when regular zirconia was used.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app