A whole greater than the sum of the parts: Close collaboration between palliative care and clinical ethics.

53 Background: The disciplines of palliative care (PC) and clinical ethics (CE) share common content but also important distinctions in method, skill set, and clinical role in a given patient encounter. Particularly in cases of advance care planning, complex decision-making, and clarifying goals oncology teams may be challenged to know which consultation service to involve.

METHODS: Case report and commentary.

RESULTS: A 60 year-old man with a 3-year history of glioblastoma multiforme presented with sudden onset right-sided weakness and altered mental status. In the emergency department, a computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a left-sided intracranial bleed with concomitant cerebral edema and left-to-right midline shift. The patient was admitted to a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) where neurosurgery declined to operate. Within hours of admission, while the patient's son (also his durable healthcare power-of-attorney) was considering a do-not-resuscitate order, local police arrived at the hospital, having received a 911 call from the patient's daughter who claimed her brother and medical providers were attempting to murder her father by shifting to comfort care. The SICU team urgently consulted PC and CE. Within an hour, PC and CE clinicians met with the patient's family to review the patient's advance directive, counsel regarding clinical management strategies and prognosis, broach comfort care, introduce hospice, and liaise with a hospice case manager. Additionally, PC collaborated with the SICU to provide best symptom management; CE worked with hospital risk management and security to ethically mitigate escalation of more reactive family members. Within 4 hours of the consults, the patient was being transferred to a local inpatient hospice facility, where he died several days later.

CONCLUSIONS: As this case demonstrates, models of close collaboration between PC and CE consultative services may swiftly facilitate appropriate transitions in care for patients with advanced cancer and simultaneous de-escalation of hospital risk. Evolving models for quality supportive care should further examine such strategies.