COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Diagnosis of paediatric sepsis by automated blood culture system and conventional blood culture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time required for isolation of aerobic bacterial pathogen from paediatric septicaemia suspects by using BACTEC 9240 blood culture system, and to compare the results with conventional blood culture technique.

METHODS: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at the Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from July to December 2013, and comprised blood samples of suspected septicaemia children. The blood samples were inoculated into automated BACTEC 9240 Peds Plus/F resin-based media. At the same time, conventional blood culture bottle was also inoculated for comparison. The time of culture positivity and bacterial spectrum isolated from these samples was evaluated. SPSS 20 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: Of the 100 blood culture samples, 36(36%) were true pathogens on BACTEC 9240, while 24(24%) were positive through the conventional method. The mean age of the participants was 0.65±20 days. Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 12(12%) samples by BACTEC 9240 and in 7(7%) cases by conventional system. BACTEC 9240 significantly reduced time of positivity from 48 hours to 21 hours compared to conventional system. The number of samples detected within 36 and 48 hours was 7(19.4%) by BACTEC 9240 and 17(70.8%) by conventional system (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of paediatric septicaemia through BACTEC 9240 was quicker with high yield and great sensitivity compared to the conventional technique.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app