We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
REVIEW
Could urinary nerve growth factor be a biomarker for overactive bladder? A meta-analysis.
Neurourology and Urodynamics 2017 September
OBJECTIVE: The previously reported association between urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) and overactive bladder (OAB) was controversial. We performed this meta-analysis based on current available studies to sum up all evidence on this association.
METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to September 2016. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: A total of 17 published studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among the studies considered, patients with OAB had a significant higher baseline urinary NGF/Cr (NGF normalized to urine creatinine) level compared to those of controls (SMD = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.43-1.04, P < 0.00001). After treatment, the level of NGF/Cr decreased significantly in OAB group. However, there was no significant difference between patients with IC (interstitial cystitis)/PBS (painful bladder syndrome) and patients with overactive bladder (OAB) with regard to the urinary NGF/Cr level (SMD = 0.18, 95%CI = -0.06 to 0.41, P = 0.14). There was a statistically significant heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.00001, I2 = 85%). No obvious evidence of significant publication bias was detected. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that urine NGF/Cr may be a useful biomarker for OAB in the future. Because of lack of specificity, it seems that NGF/Cr cannot be used as a biomarker for OAB at present. Nevertheless, combined with other biological indicators may improve its specificity in diagnosis. More high quality studies that control the compounding factors strictly should be conducted in the future.
METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to September 2016. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: A total of 17 published studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among the studies considered, patients with OAB had a significant higher baseline urinary NGF/Cr (NGF normalized to urine creatinine) level compared to those of controls (SMD = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.43-1.04, P < 0.00001). After treatment, the level of NGF/Cr decreased significantly in OAB group. However, there was no significant difference between patients with IC (interstitial cystitis)/PBS (painful bladder syndrome) and patients with overactive bladder (OAB) with regard to the urinary NGF/Cr level (SMD = 0.18, 95%CI = -0.06 to 0.41, P = 0.14). There was a statistically significant heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.00001, I2 = 85%). No obvious evidence of significant publication bias was detected. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that urine NGF/Cr may be a useful biomarker for OAB in the future. Because of lack of specificity, it seems that NGF/Cr cannot be used as a biomarker for OAB at present. Nevertheless, combined with other biological indicators may improve its specificity in diagnosis. More high quality studies that control the compounding factors strictly should be conducted in the future.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app