We have located links that may give you full text access.
Cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in right ventricle: Feasibility and normal values.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2017 May
PURPOSE: To investigate right ventricular (RV) strain in patients without identified cardiac pathology using cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking (CMR TT).
METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with no identified cardiac pathology were analyzed. RV longitudinal and circumferential strain was assessed by CMR TT. The age range was 4-81years with a median of 32years (interquartile range, 15 to 56years).
RESULTS: Analysis time per patient was <5min. The peak longitudinal strain (Ell ) was -22.11±3.51%. The peak circumferential strains (Ecc ) for global, basal, mid-cavity and apical segments were as follows: -11.69±2.25%, -11.00±2.45%, -11.17±3.36%, -12.90±3.34%. There were significant gender differences in peak Ecc at the base (P=0.04) and the mid-cavity (P=0.03) with greater deformation in females than in males. On Bland-Altman analysis, peak Ell (mean bias, 0.22±1.67; 95% CI -3.05 to 3.49) and mid-cavity Ecc (mean bias, 0.036±1.75; 95% CI, -3.39 to 3.47) had the best intra-observer agreement and inter-observer agreement, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: RV longitudinal and circumferential strains can be quickly assessed with good intra-observer and inter-observer variability using TT.
METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with no identified cardiac pathology were analyzed. RV longitudinal and circumferential strain was assessed by CMR TT. The age range was 4-81years with a median of 32years (interquartile range, 15 to 56years).
RESULTS: Analysis time per patient was <5min. The peak longitudinal strain (Ell ) was -22.11±3.51%. The peak circumferential strains (Ecc ) for global, basal, mid-cavity and apical segments were as follows: -11.69±2.25%, -11.00±2.45%, -11.17±3.36%, -12.90±3.34%. There were significant gender differences in peak Ecc at the base (P=0.04) and the mid-cavity (P=0.03) with greater deformation in females than in males. On Bland-Altman analysis, peak Ell (mean bias, 0.22±1.67; 95% CI -3.05 to 3.49) and mid-cavity Ecc (mean bias, 0.036±1.75; 95% CI, -3.39 to 3.47) had the best intra-observer agreement and inter-observer agreement, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: RV longitudinal and circumferential strains can be quickly assessed with good intra-observer and inter-observer variability using TT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app