We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of retinal vein occlusion, homocysteine, and the thrombophilic mutations in a Turkish population: A case-control study.
Ophthalmic Genetics 2017 July
PURPOSE: To compare homocysteine and thrombophilic mutations for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A between retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and healthy controls in a Turkish population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine subjects with RVO were compared for homocysteine status and the MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G20210A, and factor V Leiden mutations with those of 68 healthy controls. Then, the groups were subdivided into two subgroups according to age (less than 50 years old, equal to or more than 50 years old) and were further compared.
RESULTS: Mean plasma level of homocysteine was similar, but the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly higher in the RVO group when compared with the control group (22.5% and 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.037). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations was similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations and homocysteine levels was also similar between age subgroups (p > 0.05). Only hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different between subgroups (p = 0.037); the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different in RVO patients less than 50 years old (22.7%) from that in healthy controls less than 50 years old (11.1%). Two RVO patients (4.1%) with bilateral involvement had MTHFR C677T mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for thrombophilic mutations such as MTHFR C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A in RVO patients at all ages seems to be unnecessary and not cost-effective. However, thrombophilic disorders should be screened selectively, focusing on young individuals, especially with bilateral involvement, without additional cardiovascular risk factors, or a family history of thrombosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine subjects with RVO were compared for homocysteine status and the MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G20210A, and factor V Leiden mutations with those of 68 healthy controls. Then, the groups were subdivided into two subgroups according to age (less than 50 years old, equal to or more than 50 years old) and were further compared.
RESULTS: Mean plasma level of homocysteine was similar, but the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly higher in the RVO group when compared with the control group (22.5% and 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.037). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations was similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations and homocysteine levels was also similar between age subgroups (p > 0.05). Only hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different between subgroups (p = 0.037); the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different in RVO patients less than 50 years old (22.7%) from that in healthy controls less than 50 years old (11.1%). Two RVO patients (4.1%) with bilateral involvement had MTHFR C677T mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for thrombophilic mutations such as MTHFR C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A in RVO patients at all ages seems to be unnecessary and not cost-effective. However, thrombophilic disorders should be screened selectively, focusing on young individuals, especially with bilateral involvement, without additional cardiovascular risk factors, or a family history of thrombosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app