We have located links that may give you full text access.
The role of lesser trochanter fragment in unstable pertrochanteric A2 proximal femur fractures - is refixation of the lesser trochanter worth the effort?
Clinical Biomechanics 2017 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Instability of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures is defined by loss of medial/lateral cortical integrity with the posteromedial fragment including the lesser trochanter being pivotal for load distribution. Literature addressing the importance of lesser trochanter refixation is scarce. To clarify the effect of lesser trochanter refixation on primary stability in these fractures, following study was performed.
METHODS: 21 femora were match-paired in 3 groups and osteotomized, creating pertrochanteric fractures (AO-31A2). Group 1 was stabilized with a proximal femoral nail, group 2 with a dynamic hip screw and group 3 with an augmented proximal femoral nail. Each femur was tested non-destructively at 200 and 400N with and without refixation of the lesser trochanter (configuration A/B). The overall stiffness and movement of the femoral neck was recorded.
FINDINGS: At 200N, refixation reduced movement of the femoral neck and increased overall stiffness significantly in group 1 and 3. At 400N, refixation decreased movement of the femoral neck not significantly in all groups (1=38%, 2=36%, 3=43%). The augmented proximal femoral nail after refixation showed the highest stability of all constructs.
INTERPRETATION: Refixation of the lesser trochanter may increase the primary stability of pertrochanteric fracture osteosynthesis as all groups showed a higher primary stability. Therefore, refixation should be considered in unstable, osteoporotic fractures. If additional trauma through refixation appears inappropriate, cement augmentation should be performed as it showed only 9% less stability than a non-augmented proximal femoral nail with refixation of the lesser trochanter.
METHODS: 21 femora were match-paired in 3 groups and osteotomized, creating pertrochanteric fractures (AO-31A2). Group 1 was stabilized with a proximal femoral nail, group 2 with a dynamic hip screw and group 3 with an augmented proximal femoral nail. Each femur was tested non-destructively at 200 and 400N with and without refixation of the lesser trochanter (configuration A/B). The overall stiffness and movement of the femoral neck was recorded.
FINDINGS: At 200N, refixation reduced movement of the femoral neck and increased overall stiffness significantly in group 1 and 3. At 400N, refixation decreased movement of the femoral neck not significantly in all groups (1=38%, 2=36%, 3=43%). The augmented proximal femoral nail after refixation showed the highest stability of all constructs.
INTERPRETATION: Refixation of the lesser trochanter may increase the primary stability of pertrochanteric fracture osteosynthesis as all groups showed a higher primary stability. Therefore, refixation should be considered in unstable, osteoporotic fractures. If additional trauma through refixation appears inappropriate, cement augmentation should be performed as it showed only 9% less stability than a non-augmented proximal femoral nail with refixation of the lesser trochanter.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app