TU-FG-209-04: Testing of Digital Image Receptors Using AAPM TG-150's Draft Recommendations - Investigating the Impact of Different Processing Parameters.

PURPOSE: To evaluate implementation of AAPM TG-150's draft recommendations via a parameter study for testing the performance of digital image receptors.

METHODS: Flat field images were acquired from 9 calibrated digital image receptors associated with 9 new portable digital radiography systems (Carestream Health, Inc.) based on the draft recommendations and manufacturer-specified calibration conditions (set of 4 images at input detector air kerma ranging from 1 to 25 µGy). Effects of exposure response function (linearized and logarithmic), 'Presentation Intent Type' ('For Processing' and 'For Presentation'), detector orientation with respect to the anode-cathode axis (4 orientations; 900 rotations per iteration), different ROI sizes (5×5-40×40 mm(2) ) and elimination of varying dimensions of image border (0 mm i.e., without boundary elimination to 150 mm) on signal, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the associated nonuniformities were evaluated. Images were analyzed in Matlab and quantities were compared using ANOVA.

RESULTS: Signal, noise and SNR values averaged over 9 systems with default parameter values in draft recommendations were 4837.2±139.4, 19.7±0.9 and 246.4±10.1 (mean ± standard deviation), respectively (at input detector air kerma: 12.5 µGy). Signal, noise and SNR showed characteristic dependency on exposure response function and on 'Presentation Intent Type'. These values were not affected by ROI size and detector orientation, but analysis showed that eliminating the edge pixels along the boundary was required for the noise parameter (coefficient of variation range for noise: 72%-106% and 3%-4% without and with boundary elimination; respectively). Local and global nonuniformities showed a similar dependence on the need for boundary elimination. Interestingly, computed non-uniformities showed agreement with manufacturer-reported values except for noise non-uniformities in two units; artifacts were seen in images from these two units highlighting the importance of independent evaluations.

CONCLUSION: The effect of different parameters on performance characterization of digital image receptors was evaluated based on TG-150's draft recommendations.