We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison between real-time tissue elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis and disease progression in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.
AIM: Assessing disease progression in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is necessary in order to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate both the diagnostic accuracy of both real-time tissue elastography (RTE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and the usefulness of hepatic and splenic elasticity as predictive markers for the progression of symptomatic PBC.
METHODS: The study participants were 44 patients with PBC. We assessed hepatic and splenic elasticity using RTE and VCTE and measured serum markers related to fibrosis and hepatic and splenic blood flow using Doppler ultrasonography. We then compared RTE and VCTE for diagnostic accuracy. Patients with asymptomatic PBC were followed every 1-3 months.
RESULTS: Both RTE and VCTE performed well and had superior diagnostic accuracy compared with biochemical markers. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for RTE and VCTE were 0.92 and 0.92, 0.95 and 0.91, and 0.97 and 0.91 for F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3, and F = 4, respectively. During follow-up, nine patients (25.0%) developed liver-related symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic elasticity assessed using RTE was a significant independent factor for the development of liver-related symptoms (odds ratio, 2.19; P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time tissue elastography offered better diagnostic accuracy for severe fibrosis and cholangitis than VCTE. Splenic elasticity determined using RTE is a useful parameter for evaluating liver-related symptoms and an effective predictive marker of disease progression in patients with asymptomatic PBC.
METHODS: The study participants were 44 patients with PBC. We assessed hepatic and splenic elasticity using RTE and VCTE and measured serum markers related to fibrosis and hepatic and splenic blood flow using Doppler ultrasonography. We then compared RTE and VCTE for diagnostic accuracy. Patients with asymptomatic PBC were followed every 1-3 months.
RESULTS: Both RTE and VCTE performed well and had superior diagnostic accuracy compared with biochemical markers. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for RTE and VCTE were 0.92 and 0.92, 0.95 and 0.91, and 0.97 and 0.91 for F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3, and F = 4, respectively. During follow-up, nine patients (25.0%) developed liver-related symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic elasticity assessed using RTE was a significant independent factor for the development of liver-related symptoms (odds ratio, 2.19; P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time tissue elastography offered better diagnostic accuracy for severe fibrosis and cholangitis than VCTE. Splenic elasticity determined using RTE is a useful parameter for evaluating liver-related symptoms and an effective predictive marker of disease progression in patients with asymptomatic PBC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app