We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Autologous fat grafting: A comparative study of four current commercial protocols.
BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting is a widely used technique that gives natural results when treating soft tissue deficiencies. However, there is no consensus on which is the best procedure to use, leading to unpredictable results because of fat graft resorption.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared four commercial lipotransfer devices by analyzing the behavior of the processed adipose tissue and outcome of the adipose graft in an in vivo model.
METHODS: Four different protocols that used manual, power-assisted or water-assisted lipoaspiration and then decantation, centrifugation, or filtration were used on each of eight patients to process lipoaspirate. Harvested adipose tissue was assessed in vitro for tissue resorption, oil formation, and cytokine secretion. Graft resorption rate was calculated and histological analyses were performed after subcutaneously injecting the harvested adipose tissue in a murine model.
RESULTS: All protocols resulted in very low oil formation and histologically healthy grafts. The tissue volume was significantly greater after 2 days in culture when using manual lipoaspiration and soft centrifugations/washing steps (Microfill(®)/Macrofill(®)) compared to Water-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Decantation (BodyJet(®)) and Power-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Filtration (PAL(®) + PureGraft(®)). These results were confirmed in mice 1 month after subcutaneous injection, with greater efficiency obtained with protocols that used (A) manual aspiration, (B) soft centrifugations, and (C) washing steps.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the choice of technique used to process adipose tissue during lipotransfer surgery can highly influence fat grafting efficacy. In our study, the use of manual aspiration combined with soft centrifugations led to the best results in the selected models.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared four commercial lipotransfer devices by analyzing the behavior of the processed adipose tissue and outcome of the adipose graft in an in vivo model.
METHODS: Four different protocols that used manual, power-assisted or water-assisted lipoaspiration and then decantation, centrifugation, or filtration were used on each of eight patients to process lipoaspirate. Harvested adipose tissue was assessed in vitro for tissue resorption, oil formation, and cytokine secretion. Graft resorption rate was calculated and histological analyses were performed after subcutaneously injecting the harvested adipose tissue in a murine model.
RESULTS: All protocols resulted in very low oil formation and histologically healthy grafts. The tissue volume was significantly greater after 2 days in culture when using manual lipoaspiration and soft centrifugations/washing steps (Microfill(®)/Macrofill(®)) compared to Water-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Decantation (BodyJet(®)) and Power-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Filtration (PAL(®) + PureGraft(®)). These results were confirmed in mice 1 month after subcutaneous injection, with greater efficiency obtained with protocols that used (A) manual aspiration, (B) soft centrifugations, and (C) washing steps.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the choice of technique used to process adipose tissue during lipotransfer surgery can highly influence fat grafting efficacy. In our study, the use of manual aspiration combined with soft centrifugations led to the best results in the selected models.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app