COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Posterior short-segment fixation in thoracolumbar unstable burst fractures - Transpedicular grafting or six-screw construct?

OBJECTIVES: Early implant failure and donor-site complication remain a concern in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture underwent one-above and-below short-segment posterior pedicle screw fixation with fusion. Our aim was to evaluate the results of short-segment pedicle instrumentation enforced by two augmenting screws or injectable artificial bone cement in the fractured vertebra, and compare the differences between these two PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical and radiographic study. Twenty-seven patients were treated with a six-screw construct (group 1), and twenty-nine patients underwenta four-screw construct and fractured vertebra augmentation by injectable calcium sulfate/phosphate cement (group 2). Posterior or posterolateral fusions were not performed in both groups. The severity of the fractured vertebra was evaluated by the load-sharing classification (LSC). Local kyphosis and anterior body height of the fractured vertebra were measured and were follow-up at least 2 years. Any implant failure or loss of correction >10° degrees at the final was defined as failure of surgery. Patients' clinical results were assessed by the Denis scale.

RESULTS: Blood loss and operation time were less in group 1 (126.2±9.7 vs. 267.6±126.1ml, p<0.001 and 141.2±48.7 vs. 189.8±16.4min, p<0.001). Immediately after surgery, group 2 had a better local kyphosis angle (3.7±5.3 vs.6.0±4.1°, p=0.047) and acquired more anterior body height (94.9%±7.6% vs. 84.9%±10.0%, p<0.001). Both groups had similar clinical results (pain score: 1.5±0.8vs. 1.4±0.6, p=0.706; work score: 1.7±0.9 vs. 1.6±1.0, p=0.854). Group 1 had 3 cases of surgery failure; group 2 had 8 cases of implant failure (p=0.121). The average LSC score of these 11 patients with surgical failure was 7.2.

CONCLUSION: Thesix-screw construct had the advantage of shorter operating time, less blood loss, and lower failure rate. For those patients with anLSC score ≧7, posterior short-segment instrumentation should be used cautiously.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app