Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Atypical Intraductal Cribriform Proliferations of the Prostate Exhibit Similar Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics as Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Atypical intraductal cribriform proliferations of the prostate (AIP) are loose cribriform proliferations of luminal cells that exhibit greater architectural complexity and/or nuclear atypia than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), but lack the diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma (IDC). The significance of AIP has not been formally established. We compared the clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics of AIP with classic IDC in 310 radical prostatectomy specimens that were received over an 18-month period. Of the 310 cases, 46 cases had AIP only (n=10), IDC only (n=6), or AIP coexisting with IDC (n=30). The ERG status of all 46 AIP/IDC cases was identical to the nearby acinar carcinoma, contrasted to just 3 cases of HGPIN (7%, P<0.01). The degree of uniform phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss in 34 selected cases was identical in AIP and IDC (66.7%). No foci of HGPIN showed uniform PTEN loss; there was only 38% concordance of PTEN expression pattern between HGPIN and the nearby acinar carcinoma, unlike AIP and IDC (77% and 81%, respectively, P<0.01). AIP-associated and/or IDC-associated carcinoma (n=46) showed a higher stage and grade compared with acinar-only carcinoma (n=264, P<0.01). AIP-associated carcinoma had similar clinicopathologic features as IDC-associated carcinoma, including preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis (n=36, P>0.05). In conclusion, AIP shares similar ERG/PTEN immunoprofiles and exhibits similar clinical behavior as IDC, warranting immediate repeat biopsy when AIP is identified on biopsy, as is recommended in the most recent WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, 2016.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app