We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Short-term Effects of Supplemental Oxygen on 6-Min Walk Test Outcomes in Patients With COPD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-blind, Crossover Trial.
Chest 2017 April
BACKGROUND: The acute effect of supplemental oxygen during exercise has been shown to differ largely among patients with COPD. It is unknown what factors influence oxygen response.
METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind fashion, 124 patients with COPD underwent one 6-min walk test on supplemental oxygen (6MWTO2 ) and one 6-min walk test on room air after a practice 6-min walk test. Both gases were delivered via standard nasal prongs (2 L/min). For analyses, patients were stratified on the basis of PaO2 values and compared: (1) 34 patients with resting hypoxemia (HYX); (2) 43 patients with exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH); and (3) 31 patients with normoxemia (NOX).
RESULTS: Oxygen supplementation resulted in an increase in the 6-min walk distance in the total cohort (27 ± 42 meters; P < .001) and in the subgroups of HYX (37 ± 40 meters; P < .001) and EIH (28 ± 44 meters; P < .001) but not in the NOX subgroup (15 ± 43 meters; P = .065). Forty-two percent of patients with HYX and 47% of patients with EIH improved their 6-min walk distance to a clinically relevant extent (≥ 30 meters) by using oxygen. These oxygen responders were characterized by significantly lower 6-min walk distance using room air compared with patients without a relevant response (306 ± 106 meters vs 358 ± 113 meters; P < .05). Although oxygen saturation was significantly higher during 6MWTO2 compared with the 6-min walk test on room air in all 3 subgroups, it dropped to < 88% during 6MWTO2 in 73.5% of patients with HYX.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to patients with NOX, patients with HYX and EIH generally benefit from supplemental oxygen by increasing exercise capacity. However, less than one-half of patients reached the threshold of clinically relevant improvements. These oxygen responders were characterized by significantly lower exercise capacity levels.
TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00886639; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind fashion, 124 patients with COPD underwent one 6-min walk test on supplemental oxygen (6MWTO2 ) and one 6-min walk test on room air after a practice 6-min walk test. Both gases were delivered via standard nasal prongs (2 L/min). For analyses, patients were stratified on the basis of PaO2 values and compared: (1) 34 patients with resting hypoxemia (HYX); (2) 43 patients with exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH); and (3) 31 patients with normoxemia (NOX).
RESULTS: Oxygen supplementation resulted in an increase in the 6-min walk distance in the total cohort (27 ± 42 meters; P < .001) and in the subgroups of HYX (37 ± 40 meters; P < .001) and EIH (28 ± 44 meters; P < .001) but not in the NOX subgroup (15 ± 43 meters; P = .065). Forty-two percent of patients with HYX and 47% of patients with EIH improved their 6-min walk distance to a clinically relevant extent (≥ 30 meters) by using oxygen. These oxygen responders were characterized by significantly lower 6-min walk distance using room air compared with patients without a relevant response (306 ± 106 meters vs 358 ± 113 meters; P < .05). Although oxygen saturation was significantly higher during 6MWTO2 compared with the 6-min walk test on room air in all 3 subgroups, it dropped to < 88% during 6MWTO2 in 73.5% of patients with HYX.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to patients with NOX, patients with HYX and EIH generally benefit from supplemental oxygen by increasing exercise capacity. However, less than one-half of patients reached the threshold of clinically relevant improvements. These oxygen responders were characterized by significantly lower exercise capacity levels.
TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00886639; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app