We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Electrical impedance myography for discriminating traumatic peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity.
Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2017 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of electrical impedance myography (EIM), which is sensitive to the changes in muscle structure and physiology, in discriminating traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) in the upper extremity. To identify factors that primarily influence muscle atrophy secondary to nerve injury.
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with TPNI underwent EIM measurement and standard electromyography tests for multiple muscles in the upper extremity. The side-to-side differences in EIM parameters were calculated for each subject and compared with the compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude, which is a measure of injury severity, and the time since injury.
RESULTS: The reactance and phase values of the affected muscles were consistently lower than those of healthy muscles, with an average side-to-side difference of approximately -50% (p<0.001) and -45% (p<0.001), respectively. The CMAP amplitude, rather than the time since injury, had a greater effect on the side-to-side difference of phase values.
CONCLUSIONS: EIM discriminates TPNI by revealing asymmetries in reactance and phase values. The severity of injury had a larger influence than the time since injury on muscle atrophy secondary to nerve injury.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate the putative use of EIM in discriminating TPNI and deserves further study.
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with TPNI underwent EIM measurement and standard electromyography tests for multiple muscles in the upper extremity. The side-to-side differences in EIM parameters were calculated for each subject and compared with the compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude, which is a measure of injury severity, and the time since injury.
RESULTS: The reactance and phase values of the affected muscles were consistently lower than those of healthy muscles, with an average side-to-side difference of approximately -50% (p<0.001) and -45% (p<0.001), respectively. The CMAP amplitude, rather than the time since injury, had a greater effect on the side-to-side difference of phase values.
CONCLUSIONS: EIM discriminates TPNI by revealing asymmetries in reactance and phase values. The severity of injury had a larger influence than the time since injury on muscle atrophy secondary to nerve injury.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate the putative use of EIM in discriminating TPNI and deserves further study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app