In Vitro Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with 2 Different Protocols on Biofilm Removal from Apical Root Canals.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the XP-endo Finisher (XPF; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) in biofilm removal in comparison with conventional needle irrigation (CNI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) using an infected tooth model with an artificial apical groove.

METHODS: Fifty-four extracted human single-rooted premolars were selected. Each tooth was split longitudinally into 2 halves, with a groove made in the apical segment of the canal wall. After growing mixed bacteria biofilm for 4 weeks, the split halves were reassembled and instrumented using Vortex Blue files (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) to size 40/.06. The instrumented teeth were randomly assigned to 6 groups (n = 8) according to the final irrigation protocol. Three different techniques (CNI, PUI, and XPF) were performed each with either continuous irrigation or 3-step irrigation. Scanning electron microscopic images were taken to evaluate the amount of residual biofilm inside and outside the groove.

RESULTS: Robust growth of biofilm was observed in each canal of the controls after 4 weeks. XPF showed the best biofilm removal efficacy inside and outside the groove followed by PUI and CNI (P < .05). The XPF 2 group using the 3-step protocol showed better antibiofilm efficiency than the XPF 1 group with continuous irrigation inside the groove (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: The XP-endo Finisher, as an irrigation agitation technique, may help to remove biofilm from hard-to-reach areas in the root canal system. The 3-step irrigation protocol was more effective than continuous irrigation when XPF was used.