We have located links that may give you full text access.
Analysis of motion in laparoscopy: the deconstruction of an intra-corporeal suturing task.
Surgical Endoscopy 2017 August
BACKGROUND: This study analyzes instrument motion for segments of a defined intra-corporeal suturing task in a laparoscopic simulator. We describe a system providing real-time velocity and acceleration assessment in the performance of this task. Analysis of the deconstructed task segments allows targeted assessment and teaching.
METHODS: A traditional box trainer was fitted with a custom-built motion-tracking system. Participants were stratified into novice, intermediate and expert groups. They performed a defined intra-corporeal suturing task. Real-time data were collected in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) (Roll, Surge, Pitch, Yaw). The task was then deconstructed into four segments: loading needle/pull-through, double-throw knot, first single-throw knot, and second single-throw knot. Motion analysis parameters (MAPs) were studied for each DOF.
RESULTS: Sixty-four participants were tested (14 novices, 19 intermediates, 31 experts). The largest difference in MAPs was seen in the 'double-throw knot' segment. MAPs for the 'loading needle/pull-through' segment revealed differences between novices and experts in Roll and Pitch DOFs only. For the 'first single knot' segment, similar MAP trends were noted across all DOFs, with significant differences between novices versus experts and intermediates versus experts. For the 'second single knot' segment, the difference in MAPs was preserved only for novices versus experts.
CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing motion for a defined suturing task in a laparoscopic simulator, we can gain insight into the specific hand motions distinguishing experts from non-experts. Such information may allow teaching in a more focused, effective and efficient manner.
METHODS: A traditional box trainer was fitted with a custom-built motion-tracking system. Participants were stratified into novice, intermediate and expert groups. They performed a defined intra-corporeal suturing task. Real-time data were collected in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) (Roll, Surge, Pitch, Yaw). The task was then deconstructed into four segments: loading needle/pull-through, double-throw knot, first single-throw knot, and second single-throw knot. Motion analysis parameters (MAPs) were studied for each DOF.
RESULTS: Sixty-four participants were tested (14 novices, 19 intermediates, 31 experts). The largest difference in MAPs was seen in the 'double-throw knot' segment. MAPs for the 'loading needle/pull-through' segment revealed differences between novices and experts in Roll and Pitch DOFs only. For the 'first single knot' segment, similar MAP trends were noted across all DOFs, with significant differences between novices versus experts and intermediates versus experts. For the 'second single knot' segment, the difference in MAPs was preserved only for novices versus experts.
CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing motion for a defined suturing task in a laparoscopic simulator, we can gain insight into the specific hand motions distinguishing experts from non-experts. Such information may allow teaching in a more focused, effective and efficient manner.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app